Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Lingwen Zhong, Senta Georgia, Shuen-ing Tschen, Keiko Nakayama, Keiichi Nakayama, Anil Bhushan
Published in Volume 117, Issue 10
J Clin Invest. 2007; 117(10):2869–2876 doi:10.1172/JCI32198
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 6
Skp2–/– mice failed to compensate for diet-induced insulin resistance.

(A) Insulin tolerance test 12 weeks after feeding with HFD or ND (55% and 12.2% calories from fat, respectively). n = 5. HFD-fed mice were compared with ND-fed mice. P < 0.03 (20 minutes); P < 0.003 (40 minutes); P < 0.005 (60 minutes). (B) When insulin tolerance test was represented as area under the curve, the mice fed HFD were significantly insulin insensitive compared with mice fed ND. P < 0.13 between groups fed ND; P < 0.27 between groups fed HFD; P < 0.009 between Skp+/– groups; P < 0.006 between Skp–/– groups. (C) Blood glucose level after overnight fasting. Fasting blood glucose over 200 mg/dl was defined as diabetes. n = 5 (Skp2+/– ND and Skp2–/– ND); 8 (Skp2+/– HFD); 6 (Skp2–/– HFD). (D) Glucose tolerance test 12 weeks after feeding with HFD. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.005.