Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Chee-Onn Leong, Nick Vidnovic, Maurice Phillip DeYoung, Dennis Sgroi, Leif W. Ellisen
Published in Volume 117, Issue 5
J Clin Invest. 2007; 117(5):1370–1380 doi:10.1172/JCI30866
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 4
TAp73 mediates cisplatin sensitivity in breast cancer cells expressing TAp73 and ΔNp63.

(A) Inhibition of TAp73 induced resistance specifically to cisplatin. Dose-response curves (MTT cell viability assay) of cells expressing the control vector or a TAp73-directed lentiviral shRNA 5 days following treatment with cisplatin (Cis), doxorubicin (Dox), or paclitaxel (Tax). Little or no effect of TAp73 knockdown was observed in MCF-7 cells. Error bars show SD for 3 independent experiments. (B) TAp73 mediated selective proapoptotic target gene induction in response to cisplatin. QRT-PCR analysis of the indicated genes in HCC-1937 cells as in A 6 hours after cisplatin treatment (at IC70, 6.6 μM). (C) TAp73 expression conveyed specific cisplatin sensitivity to normal basal mammary epithelial cells. MCF-10A cells were infected with a retrovirus encoding TAp73β or the control vector, followed by quantitative dose-response analysis as shown in A (P < 0.01, 1-tailed Student’s t test). TAp73β increased sensitivity (i.e., decreased the IC50) only for cisplatin. Error bars show SD for 3 independent experiments.