Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Vincenzo Russo, Arcadi Cipponi, Laura Raccosta, Cristina Rainelli, Raffaella Fontana, Daniela Maggioni, Francesca Lunghi, Sylvain Mukenge, Fabio Ciceri, Marco Bregni, Claudio Bordignon, Catia Traversari
Published in Volume 117, Issue 10
J Clin Invest. 2007; 117(10):3087–3096 doi:10.1172/JCI30605
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 3
Ex vivo analysis of OT-I and OT-II activation following vaccination with OVA-GMLs.

(A) Structure of the retroviral vector OVA-CSM. (B) Twenty-four hours after the infusion of CFSE-labeled OT-I T cells, mice were given mock-GMLs (Mock) or OVA-GMLs from WT (OVA WT) or β2m–/– (OVA β2m–/–) mice. Density dot plots (CFSE, left panels) show OT-I proliferation following treatments. Histograms show the expression of CD44 and downregulation of CD62L. (C) OT-I T cells from treated mice were restimulated in vitro with OVA257–264–loaded splenocytes and tested for IFN-γ release against pulsed or unpulsed RMA cells. In vitro–activated OT-I T cells were used as positive control. (D) Twenty-four hours after the infusion of CFSE-labeled OT-II T cells, mice were given mock- or OVA β2m–/– GMLs. Density dot plots show OT-II proliferation following treatment with OVA β2m–/– GMLs (CFSE, left panels). Histograms show the expression of CD44 and downregulation of CD62L. Data are representative of 3 (B) or 2 (D) experiments performed on splenocytes of 2 mice/group. (E) B16-OVA–bearing mice were transferred with OT-I T cells and then treated with mock- or OVA-GMLs from WT or β2m–/– mice. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.005; Student’s t test. (F) Mice adoptively transferred with OT-I T cells were challenged with mock- or OVA-GMLs from WT and β2m–/– mice. Forty days later, mice were challenged with B16-OVA cells and followed up. **P < 0.005, P < 0.0005; Student’s t test. Data are representative of 3 (E) or 2 (F) experiments with 5 mice/group.