Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Vincenzo Russo, Arcadi Cipponi, Laura Raccosta, Cristina Rainelli, Raffaella Fontana, Daniela Maggioni, Francesca Lunghi, Sylvain Mukenge, Fabio Ciceri, Marco Bregni, Claudio Bordignon, Catia Traversari
Published in Volume 117, Issue 10
J Clin Invest. 2007; 117(10):3087–3096 doi:10.1172/JCI30605
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 1
Infusion of TRP-2–GMLs protects mice from tumor challenge, induces memory responses, and prolongs survival of tumor-bearing mice.

(A) B6 splenocytes were transduced with the retroviral vector TRP-2–CSM encoding TRP-2 and the ΔLNGFr marker. (B) Transduction efficiency. Ninety percent of CD3+ cells (middle and right panels) expressed ΔLNGFr (right panel). Mock-transduced splenocytes were negative (middle panel). (C) B6 mice were treated with mock-transduced GMLs; TRP-2–GMLs from WT (TRP-2 WT) or β2m–/– mice (TRP-2 β2m–/–); or DCs pulsed with 2 TRP-2 peptides (TRP-2–pulsed DCs). TRP-2–GMLs from both WT and β2m–/– mice were able to control tumor growth. *P = 0.03, **P < 0.05; Student’s t test. (D) The infusion of TRP-2–GMLs elicits TRP-2–specific cytotoxic T cells. Splenocytes from vaccinated mice were restimulated in vitro with TRP-2 peptides and tested in a cytotoxicity assay against pulsed (filled symbols) or unpulsed (open symbols) RMA cells. (E) Induction of memory antitumor responses. Forty days after vaccination, B16 cells were implanted s.c. TRP-2–GMLs from both WT and β2m–/– mice were able to control tumor growth. P < 0.005,P < 0.0005; Student’s t test. Data shown in C and E are representative of 2 experiments with 5 mice/group. (F) Kaplan-Meier survival graphs. Mice were treated as described in Methods. Statistical comparison of the survival curves, performed by the log-rank test, gave the following results: 4 × 106 TRP-2–GMLs versus mock-GMLs, P < 0.005; 10 × 106 TRP-2–GMLs versus mock-GMLs, P < 0.005; TRP-2–pulsed DCs versus mock-GMLs, P < 0.005.