Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Claudia Wrzesinski, Chrystal M. Paulos, Luca Gattinoni, Douglas C. Palmer, Andrew Kaiser, Zhiya Yu, Steven A. Rosenberg, Nicholas P. Restifo
Published in Volume 117, Issue 2
J Clin Invest. 2007; 117(2):492–501 doi:10.1172/JCI30414
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 2
HSCs drive the proliferation and antitumor activity of naive and effector pmel-1 CD8+ T cells in mice treated with a myeloablative preparative regimen and an HSC transplant.

(A) The expansion of naive and effector pmel-1 CD8+ T cells is comparable in myeloablated hosts with HSC transplant. Gene-marked (Thy1.1+) naive or effector pmel-1 CD8+ T cells (1 × 106) were adoptively transferred with rhIL-2 into a nonmyeloablated host (left panel) or a myeloablated host receiving an HSC transplant (right panel). The absolute numbers of pmel-1 CD8+ T cells in the spleens of treated animals were enumerated on the days indicated. Spleens of 3 mice per group were pooled at each time point. This experiment was performed 3 times, with similar results. (B) Naive and effector pmel-1 CD8+ T cells elicit a similar tumor treatment in myeloablated hosts with HSC transplant. Naive or effector pmel-1 CD8+ T cells (1 × 106) were transferred with rhIL-2 in nonmyeloablated (left panel) or myeloablated hosts with HSC transplant (right panel). Both naive and effector pmel-1 CD8+ T cells mediated significant tumor treatment (9 Gy/HSC: P = 0.0003, NT versus naive PI; 9 Gy/HSC: P = 0.0002, NT versus activated PI; 9 Gy/HSC: P = 0.76, naive versus effector PI), but no tumor treatment was seen in nonmyeloablated animals. Results for tumor area are the mean of measurements from 5 mice per group (±SEM).