Artificial lymph nodes induce potent secondary immune responses in naive and immunodeficient mice
J. Clin. Invest. Noriaki Okamoto, et al. 117:997 doi:10.1172/JCI30379 [
Go to this article.]

Figure 6Enrichment of memory-type (CD44
hiCD62L
lo) CD4
+ T cells in aLNs or spleens of aLN-transplanted SCID mice.
(
A) FACS plots demonstrating an increase in the CD44
hiCD62L
lo memory-type CD4
+ T cell population in aLNs compared with that in lymph nodes of recipient BALB/c mice. Downward pointing arrows indicate the CD44/CD62L profile of cells within the CD4
+ T cell gate. (
B) FACS plots demonstrating an increase in the CD44
hiCD62L
lo memory-type CD4
+ T cell population in the spleens of aLN-transplanted SCID mice, regardless of antigen stimulation, compared with that of lymph nodes or spleens in normal BALB/c mouse preimmunized with the same doses of NP-OVA. Numbers in the plots in
A and
B indicate the percentage of cells within the CD62L
lo/CD44
+ gate. (
C) Immunohistochemical staining of CD127
+ T cells in aLNs. Three weeks after aLNs were formed in NP-OVA preimmunized BALB/c mice, aLNs and lymph nodes of recipient BALB/c mice were stained with FITC-labeled anti-mouse CD3, anti-mouse CD127 antibodies, and Alexa Fluor 594–conjugated anti-rat IgG. Most CD3
+ T cells were also CD127
+.