Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Enrique Zudaire, Natalia Cuesta, Vundavalli Murty, Karen Woodson, Lisa Adams, Nieves Gonzalez, Alfredo Martínez, Gopeshwar Narayan, Ilan Kirsch, Wilbur Franklin, Fred Hirsch, Michael Birrer, Frank Cuttitta
Published in Volume 118, Issue 2
J Clin Invest. 2008; 118(2):640–650 doi:10.1172/JCI30024
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 3
Effects of siRNA-induced silencing of AHRR.

(A) A549E (black bars), A549F (white bars), and A549G (gray bars) were incubated in serum-free media (R0) or the appropriate media containing α-Fas or MK886. In all experiments (n = 3), A549F/G showed enhanced resistant to proapoptotic signals when compared with A549E. (B) DIVAA analysis showed that A549F and A549G have enhanced angiogenic potential when compared with A549E, and this effect was more prominent for A549G than for A549F (n = 8). (C) Silencing of AHRR (A549F/G) enhances the migratory (black bars) and invasive (white bars) potential of the A549 tumor cell line (n = 6). Detail photos of the porous membranes used to determine migratory potential of A549E and A549G are also shown. Original magnification, ×10. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.