Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Chad A. Dickey, Adeela Kamal, Karen Lundgren, Natalia Klosak, Rachel M. Bailey, Judith Dunmore, Peter Ash, Sareh Shoraka, Jelena Zlatkovic, Christopher B. Eckman, Cam Patterson, Dennis W. Dickson, N. Stanley Nahman, Michael Hutton, Francis Burrows, Leonard Petrucelli
Published in Volume 117, Issue 3
J Clin Invest. 2007; 117(3):648–658 doi:10.1172/JCI29715
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 2
Proposed mechanism of chaperone/client pathway.

A substrate may initially be recognized by the Hsp40/Hsp70 complex with CHIP as the cochaperone/E3 ubiquitin (Ub) ligase. Transfer of the substrate to the Hsp90 complex is facilitated by Hop. There remain 2 fates for the substrate: dephosphorylation and refolding or ubiquitin-dependent proteasomal degradation. The mechanisms dictating which pathway is taken remain undefined. Hsp90 expression inhibits HSF1 activity by direct binding, which prevents HSF1 phosphorylation and trimerization. When Hsp90 is inhibited, Hsp90 levels are decreased, releasing HSF1, which in turn promotes de novo transcription of Hsps.