Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Katherine A. Gallagher, Zhao-Jun Liu, Min Xiao, Haiying Chen, Lee J. Goldstein, Donald G. Buerk, April Nedeau, Stephen R. Thom, Omaida C. Velazquez
Published in Volume 117, Issue 5
J Clin Invest. 2007; 117(5):1249–1259 doi:10.1172/JCI29710
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 2
NO-dependent EPC, not lymphocyte, mobilization is enhanced by hyperoxia.

Flow cytometry quantification of circulating peripheral blood EPCs (CXCR4+/VEGFR2+) (A) and lymphocytes (B) in diabetic FVB and eNOS–/– mice and peripheral blood EPCs (Tie2+/VEGFR2+) in Tie2-GFP (H) mice. Data are based on 6 (A and B) and 12 (H) experiments. Mice were treated with or without HBO (HBO+ and HBO, respectively) or with l-NAME ± HBO. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.005. (CG and IP) HBO significantly increased circulating EPCs, while l-NAME inhibited this effect. Representative dot plots with number of circulating EPCs in peripheral blood of diabetic FVB (CG) and nondiabetic (IL) and diabetic (MP) Tie2-GFP mice are shown. (C, I, and M) HBO, (D, J, and N) HBO+, (E, K, and O) l-NAME, and (F, L, and P) l-NAME+HBO. (G) Isotype control (VEGFR2/CXCR4).