Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Christo D. Venkov, Andrew J. Link, Jennifer L. Jennings, David Plieth, Tsutomu Inoue, Kojiro Nagai, Carol Xu, Yoana N. Dimitrova, Frank J. Rauscher, Eric G. Neilson
Published in Volume 117, Issue 2
J Clin Invest. 2007; 117(2):482–491 doi:10.1172/JCI29544
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 1
Identification and purification of the FTS-1 complex by EMSA and DNA affinity chromatography.

(A) Similar complexes form in EMSA with fibroblast nuclear protein and either 25-bp or 100-bp probes, both containing the FTS-1 core pentanucleotide. The complexes were challenged with nonlabeled probes. (B) Specificity of the FTS-1 complex established by EMSA following challenge by various nonlabeled competitors. Fibroblast nuclear protein was incubated with the 25-bp radiolabeled FTS-1 or its mutant form (m). The complexes were challenged with DNA probes specific for different regulatory sites. The complex specific to the TTGAT pentanucleotide (marked 1) is at the top; (m) indicates the mutated oligonucleotides. (C) The FTS-1 complex (marked 1) is formed by MCT cells induced to EMT as evidenced by EMSA at different times after induction. A fibroblast-derived FTS-1 complex is shown as a positive control. (D) DNA affinity-purified proteins form only 1 complex with FTS-1 (marked 1) in EMSA. Fractions purified by the direct or indirect approach were eluted with 0.5 M KCl followed by 0.5 M KCl plus 5 M urea, dialyzed against 0.1 M KCl, and incubated with radiolabeled FTS-1 or its mutated form (m). The flow-through (FT) from the direct incubation could not form the FTS-1 complex.