Published in Volume
116, Issue 6
(June 1, 2006)J Clin Invest.
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Clinical Investigation
Cryptococcal virulence: beyond the usual suspects
Department of Microbiology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Address correspondence to: Aaron P. Mitchell, Department of Microbiology, Columbia University, 906 Hammer Building, 701 West 168th Street, New York, New York 10032, USA. Phone: (212) 305-8251; Fax: (212) 342-1741; E-mail:
Published June 1, 2006
In this issue of the JCI, the observation of the altered pathogenicity of a Cryptococcus neoformans glucosylceramide (GlcCer) mutant shines new light on the initiation of cryptococcal infection. Rittershaus and colleagues demonstrate that the cell surface glycosphingolipid GlcCer is essential for the fungus to grow in the extracellular environments of the host bloodstream and alveolar spaces of the lung, which, in contrast to the acidic intracellular environment of macrophages, are characterized by a neutral pH (see the related article beginning on page 1651). Their findings establish an unexpected connection between this glycosphingolipid and the fungal responses to physiological CO2 and pH. They also focus new attention on the therapeutic potential of anti-GlcCer antibodies found in convalescent sera.
Cryptococcus neoformans is among the few fungal pathogens with well-defined virulence factors, including a polysaccharide capsule and a melanin coat (1). The recent past has witnessed the identification of many new genes that impact C. neoformans virulence, and in most cases the new genes ultimately govern those known virulence factors. A report from Rittershaus, Del Poeta, and colleagues in this issue of the JCI (2) is thus surprising in that it establishes that a new virulence regulator does not act through any previously known virulence traits, but through a connection between lipid-mediated signaling and the pathogen’s response to the CO2 levels and pH of host tissue. The report provides intriguing new insight into the natural infection process and points to the potential therapeutic significance of an antifungal antibody response.
The connection between GlcCer andC. neoformans
C. neoformans is an opportunistic pathogen that causes disseminated infection and meningoencephalitis in immunocompromised hosts, especially those with AIDS (1). Its close relative, Cryptococcus gattii, is a primary pathogen that caused an outbreak recently on Vancouver Island (3, 4). Infection begins with inhalation of airborne spores or yeast cells. The organism is eventually phagocytosed by macrophages, in which it survives as an intracellular pathogen (5). Rittershaus and colleagues show that the poorly understood events that occur between inhalation and macrophage phagocytosis depend upon cryptococcal synthesis of the sphingolipid glucosylceramide (GlcCer) (2).
GlcCer is found at the surface of C. neoformans cells and accumulates at the neck between the mother cell and the emerging daughter cell. In order to determine the function of GlcCer, the authors created a mutant C. neoformans strain lacking GlcCer synthase 1 (Gcs1), which they rigorously show to be encoded by the gcs1 gene (2). This Δgcs1 mutant had an unusual phenotype: it was completely avirulent in mice following nasal inhalation, yet caused lethal infection when delivered through intravenous injection (Figure 1). The inhaled organisms were largely confined to the lung, where they were contained by surrounding layers of host defense cells in what is known as a granulomatous response. A battery of tests of virulence factor production and known attenuating defects failed to identify any reasonable cause of the virulence defect. The authors finally made what is believed to be a novel observation: growth of the Δgcs1 mutant was blocked specifically in the presence of high (5%) CO2 levels, and only at neutral (as opposed to acidic) pH. The Δgcs1 mutant grows perfectly well within macrophages, where it is transported to the acidic lysosome. However, it is unable to traverse the tissue of the lung to reach that intracellular sanctuary.
Natural C. neoformans infection is initiated after inhalation of airborne spores or cells. After reaching the lung alveoli, the organism is taken up by macrophages into their acidic lysosomes, where the organism divides and disseminates. The report from Rittershaus and colleagues in this issue of the JCI (2) shows that there is a critical extracellular growth phase after the organism reaches the lung, but before uptake by macrophages. In this phase, the organism encounters the neutral pH and physiological (~5%) CO2 level that characterizes host tissues. Rittershaus et al. find that the fungal surface sphingolipid GlcCer is critical for growth under these specific conditions. Thus GlcCer is required for experimental murine infections that are initiated by inhalation (A), but not for infections initiated by injection (B).
Implications of GlcCer function
This work (2) establishes a connection among GlcCer function and 2 fungal responses that are intimately tied to virulence. The first is the response to neutral or alkaline pH. This response and its relationship to virulence are well established from studies of the fungi Aspergillus, Saccharomyces, and Candida (6, 7). The Rim101/PacC pH response pathway does not appear to be conserved in C. neoformans, but there are several other candidate pH response mediators that are conserved, notably calcineurin (8). The second relevant response is to CO2. CO2 levels are low (<0.04%) in the atmosphere but high (~5%) in tissue, and it has long been known that high CO2 levels induce C. neoformans capsule synthesis (9). Our understanding of CO2 sensing has been revolutionized recently through the work of Buck, Levin, and colleagues (10), whose studies reveal that soluble adenylyl cyclase is an evolutionarily conserved CO2 sensor. Muhlschlegel’s lab has extended that work elegantly with the demonstration that C. neoformans adenylyl cyclase, though membrane associated, is nonetheless CO2 responsive (11). Thus it is possible that GlcCer function is tied to adenylyl cyclase activity. But, as with any rapidly evolving field, there are many other equally plausible scenarios. Noteworthy in that context is the work of Bahn et al. (12), who showed that high CO2 levels inhibit C. neoformans sexual development, and this inhibition requires the carbonic anhydrase specified by the can2 gene. Although the signal transduction pathway that mediates sex inhibition is not known, the parallels raise a simple question: is the can2 carbonic anhydrase also required for CO2 inhibition of growth in the Δgcs1 mutant? These signal transduction–related questions will keep microbial molecular geneticists busy for some time to come.
A second fascinating aspect of this study is the insight it provides into the mechanism of establishment of infection. The path from inhalation to dissemination is dimly lit, and the last major insight into these events was the finding that C. neoformans is a facultative intracellular pathogen in vivo (5). With the present finding that the Δgcs1 mutant cannot effectively reach the macrophage (2), one can begin to ask what functions permit the wild-type organism to do so. Perhaps most important is to understand whether and how wild-type cryptococci actively inhibit the protective granulomatous response.
Finally, this study highlights a potential therapeutic strategy. Convalescent sera have been shown to contain fungus-specific anti-GlcCer antibodies (13). These antibodies bind to surface-accessible GlcCer and inhibit C. neoformans growth (13). The newly revealed novel properties of the Δgcs1 mutant suggest that this antibody response may be efficacious in blocking initiation of infection and that mutation of the fungus through loss of Gcs1 function would not cause a resistant infection.
I am grateful to Howard Shuman, my lab members, and the 2006 Microbial Pathogenesis class for insightful discussions and comments. My endeavors beyond my immediate research programs are supported by the Harold S. Ginsberg Professorship in Molecular Pathogenesis.
Idnurm, A., et al. 2005. Deciphering the model pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 3:753-764.
Rittershaus, P.C., et al. 2006.
Glucosylceramide synthase is an essential regulator of pathogenicity ofCryptococcus neoformans
J. Clin. Invest. 116:1651-1659.
Fraser, J.A., et al. 2005. Same-sex mating and the origin of the Vancouver Island Cryptococcus gattii outbreak. Nature. 437:1360-1364.
Kidd, S.E., et al. 2004. A rare genotype of Cryptococcus gattii caused the cryptococcosis outbreak on Vancouver Island (British Columbia, Canada). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101:17258-17263.
Feldmesser, M., Tucker, S., Casadevall, A. 2001. Intracellular parasitism of macrophages by Cryptococcus neoformans. Trends Microbiol. 9:273-278.
Bignell, E., et al. 2005. The Aspergillus pH-responsive transcription factor PacC regulates virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 55:1072-1084.
Davis, D. 2003. Adaptation to environmental pH in Candida albicans and its relation to pathogenesis. Curr. Genet. 44:1-7.
Fox, D.S., Heitman, J. 2002. Good fungi gone bad: the corruption of calcineurin. Bioessays. 24:894-903.
Granger, D.L., Perfect, J.R., Durack, D.T. 1985. Virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans. Regulation of capsule synthesis by carbon dioxide. J. Clin. Invest. 76:508-516.
Chen, Y., et al. 2000. Soluble adenylyl cyclase as an evolutionarily conserved bicarbonate sensor. Science. 289:625-628.
Mogensen, E.G., et al. 2006.
Cryptococcus neoformans senses CO2
through the carbonic anhydrase Can2 and the adenylyl cyclase Cac1.
Eukaryot. Cell. 5:103-111.
Bahn, Y.S., Cox, G.M., Perfect, J.R., Heitman, J. 2005. Carbonic anhydrase and CO2 sensing during Cryptococcus neoformans growth, differentiation, and virulence. Curr. Biol. 15:2013-2020.
Rodrigues, M.L., et al. 2000. Human antibodies against a purified glucosylceramide from Cryptococcus neoformans inhibit cell budding and fungal growth. Infect. Immun. 68:7049-7060..