Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Ravi K. Amaravadi, Duonan Yu, Julian J. Lum, Thi Bui, Maria A. Christophorou, Gerard I. Evan, Andrei Thomas-Tikhonenko, Craig B. Thompson
Published in Volume 117, Issue 2
J Clin Invest. 2007; 117(2):326–336 doi:10.1172/JCI28833
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 1
Effects of CQ with and without p53 activation on the regression of Myc/p53ERTAM lymphomas.

(A) CQ impairs tumor growth. Cells from a primary Myc/p53ERTAM tumor were harvested and passaged in vivo in 6 syngeneic C57BL/6×129F1 mice. Cells were injected subcutaneously into the flanks of mice. When tumors reached a volume of more than 1,000 mm3, mice were assigned to daily PBS i.p. or 60 mg/kg/d CQ i.p. Results shown are mean ± SD daily tumor volumes and are representative of multiple experiments. *P < 0.05. (B) CQ delays tumor recurrence after p53-induced tumor regression. Myc/p53ERTAM cells were injected subcutaneously into the flanks of 18 C57BL/6×129F1 mice. Once tumors reached a volume of more than 1,500 mm3, mice were assigned to daily treatment (arrow) with 1 mg/d TAM i.p. plus saline (TAM/PBS) or 1 mg/d TAM i.p. plus 60 mg/kg/d CQ i.p. (TAM/CQ). Results shown are daily tumor volumes (mean ± SD) for each group from a representative experiment. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.005.