Constraints in antigen presentation severely restrict T cell recognition of the allogeneic fetus
J. Clin. Invest. Adrian Erlebacher, et al. 117:1399 doi:10.1172/JCI28214 [
Go to this article.]

Figure 2OVA shed from the conceptus accumulates on FDCs. (
A–
G) OVA accumulation on splenic FDCs. (
A–
D) E17.5 spleens from Act-mOVA–mated (
A and
B) or B6-mated (
C and
D) mice double stained for OVA (red;
A and
C) and CD35 (green;
B and
D). Red pulp is apparent as areas of diffuse green staining resulting from rbc rendered artifactually fluorescent by the immunohistochemistry protocol. Data are representative of
n = 8–9 mice per group on E15.5–E17.5. Scale bar: 0.5 mm. (
E–
G) High-power confocal photomicrographs of a double-stained OVA
+ focus, showing OVA staining (
E), CD35 staining (
F), and the merged image (
G). (
H–
J) OVA accumulation on LN FDCs. (
H) Two subcutaneous LNs from an Act-mOVA–mated mouse on E17.5; a higher magnification of the OVA
+ focus indicated with an arrow is shown in
I. Data are representative of all
n = 8 mice analyzed at E15.5–E17.5. (
J) An OVA
+ focus in a uterine LN on E11.5, as such foci begin to appear. Similar foci were seen in
n = 3 of 4 mice analyzed. Scale bar: 1 mm (
H) and 0.2 mm in (
I and
J). As in
C, LNs from B6-mated mice showed no OVA
+ foci (data not shown).