Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Rory J. McCrimmon, Zhentao Song, Haiying Cheng, Ewan C. McNay, Catherine Weikart-Yeckel, Xiaoning Fan, Vanessa H. Routh, Robert S. Sherwin
Published in Volume 116, Issue 6
J Clin Invest. 2006; 116(6):1723–1730 doi:10.1172/JCI27775
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 5
Consecutive whole-cell current clamp recordings from VMH GI neurons.

Resting membrane potential (RMP) is noted to the right of each trace. The downward deflections represent the membrane voltage response to a constant hyperpolarizing pulse. (A) Under control conditions, RMP, APF, and IR reversibly increased when glucose levels decreased from 2.5 to 0.5 (upper trace) or 0.1 mM (lower trace). (B) Following pretreatment of the brain slice with 0.2 μM UCN I, MP, APF, and IR reversibly increased only when glucose levels decreased from 2.5 to 0.1 mM (upper trace) but not from 2.5 to 0.5 mM (lower trace; n = 9). (C) Pretreatment of the brain slices with 0.2 μM UCN I plus 1 μM aSVG reversibly increased MP, APF, and IR when glucose levels decreased from 2.5 to 0.1 (upper trace), 0.5 (middle trace), and 1 mM (lower trace). (D) UCN I significantly reduced the increased IR in response to decreased extracellular glucose from 2.5 to 0.5 mM (control, 28.9% ± 5.2% versus UCN, –1.7% ± 2.7%; P < 0.0001). aSVG reversed this effect (UCN plus aSVG, 14.1% ± 5.5% versus UCN, –1.7% ± 2.7%; P = 0.02).