Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Louis J. Picker, Edward F. Reed-Inderbitzin, Shoko I. Hagen, John B. Edgar, Scott G. Hansen, Alfred Legasse, Shannon Planer, Michael Piatak, Jeffrey D. Lifson, Vernon C. Maino, Michael K. Axthelm, Francois Villinger
Published in Volume 116, Issue 6
J Clin Invest. 2006; 116(6):1514–1524 doi:10.1172/JCI27564
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 5
IL-15–responsive memory subsets do not accumulate in peripheral blood.

(A) The fraction of total CD4+ and CD8+ memory T cells in each of the CD28/CCR7–defined subsets in blood (see Figure 1A) is shown before, during, and after IL-15 treatment (the same IL-15–treated RMs shown in Figure 2). Note that despite vast differences in IL-15–induced proliferation between these subsets, their relative frequencies in blood (particularly the TCM-to-TEM ratio) either did not change or changed only transiently. (B) The absolute number of CD4+ and CD8+ CD28CCR7 TEM cells is shown in the same RMs. Again, profound IL-15–induced proliferation resulted in only transiently increased numbers of TEM cells in peripheral blood.