Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Yan Cheng, Miao Wang, Ying Yu, John Lawson, Colin D. Funk, Garret A. FitzGerald
Published in Volume 116, Issue 5
J Clin Invest. 2006; 116(5):1391–1399 doi:10.1172/JCI27540
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 4
The major urinary metabolite of PGE2 and the suppressive effect of PGHS-1 disruption or KD and PGHS-2 disruption or mutation on PGE2 biosynthesis.

(A) A selected ion-monitoring trace of the methoxime derivative of endogenous PGEM (9,15-dioxo-11α-hydroxy-2,3,4,5-tetranor-prostane-1,20-dioic-17,17,18,18,19,19-d6 acid) (bottom panel) and its hexadeuterated internal standard (top panel). (B) Urinary PGEM decreased significantly in both male and female PGHS-2 KO or PGHS-2Y385F mice compared with WT controls on a mixed C57BL/6 × 129/Sv genetic background (n = 5–6; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.001). PGEM was also significantly lower in PGHS-1 KD and PGHS-1 KO groups compared with WT mice of mixed C57BL/6 × 129/Sv genetic background (n = 5–6; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.001). PGEM was significantly higher in PGHS-2Y385F mice compared with PGHS-2 KO mice (#P < 0.05) on the same genetic background.