Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Leona Plum, Xiaosong Ma, Brigitte Hampel, Nina Balthasar, Roberto Coppari, Heike Münzberg, Marya Shanabrough, Denis Burdakov, Eva Rother, Ruth Janoschek, Jens Alber, Bengt F. Belgardt, Linda Koch, Jost Seibler, Frieder Schwenk, Csaba Fekete, Akira Suzuki, Tak W. Mak, Wilhelm Krone, Tamas L. Horvath, Frances M. Ashcroft, Jens C. Brüning
Published in Volume 116, Issue 7
J Clin Invest. 2006; 116(7):1886–1901 doi:10.1172/JCI27123
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 3
Phenotypic characteristics of control (open symbols; white bars) and PPKO (filled symbols; black bars) male mice under different dietary conditions with respect to energy homeostasis.

(A)Average body weights of male mice on ND (diamonds) or HFD (squares) (n = 4–93). (B)Average body length of males on ND (n = 13–22). (C)BMI of male ND-fed control and PPKO mice (n = 13–22). (D)Absolute and relative (corrected for body weight) epididymal fat pad weights of ND-fed control and PPKO males (n = 15–22). (E)Body fat content of male ND-fed PPKO and control males as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (n = 10–16). (F)Daily caloric intake of ND-fed control and PPKO males at the age of 10–13 weeks (n = 6 per genotype). (G)Oxygen consumption (VO2) of male body weight–matched ND-fed mice at the age of 12 weeks (n = 4 per genotype). (H)Locomotor activity of body weight–matched ND-fed males at the age of 12 weeks (n = 4 per genotype). Unless otherwise indicated, data were collected at 20 weeks of age. Values are mean ± SEM. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001 versus control.