Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Carine Blanchard, Ning Wang, Keith F. Stringer, Anil Mishra, Patricia C. Fulkerson, J. Pablo Abonia, Sean C. Jameson, Cassie Kirby, Michael R. Konikoff, Margaret H. Collins, Mitchell B. Cohen, Rachel Akers, Simon P. Hogan, Amal H. Assa’ad, Philip E. Putnam, Bruce J. Aronow, Marc E. Rothenberg
Published in Volume 116, Issue 2
J Clin Invest. 2006; 116(2):536–547 doi:10.1172/JCI26679
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 4

Correlation between eosinophil count and number of genes modified. (A) The number of genes expressed differently is presented as a function of the eosinophil count. The number of genes that changed at least 10-fold is plotted as a function of the maximum number of eosinophils in the biopsies (patients 1–23). A trendline (black line) has been inserted (r2 = 0.73, P < 0.05). (B) The overlap between the EE transcript signature (574 genes) and the 1,943 genes that most correlated (P ≤ 0.005) with the number of eosinophils is presented in a Venn diagram.