Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Kaushik Parthasarathi, Hideo Ichimura, Eiji Monma, Jens Lindert, Sadiqa Quadri, Andrew Issekutz, Jahar Bhattacharya
Published in Volume 116, Issue 8
J Clin Invest. 2006; 116(8):2193–2200 doi:10.1172/JCI26605
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 3
Inhibition of Ca2+ conduction in lung capillaries.

Shown are responses to uncaging in alveolar capillaries, before, during (Gap), and after infusion of gap26/27. (A and B) Data show attenuation of Ca2+ levels with distance from uncaging site (baseline endothelial Ca2+ level was 76 ± 5 nM; n = 4 for each bar) and responses to scrambled gap26/27 (scgap) showing no inhibition (baseline endothelial Ca2+ level was 79 ± 10 nM; n = 3 for each bar). (C) Data show uncaging-induced responses during infusion of gap26/27 in capillaries (Cap) and venules (Ven). Capillary and venular sites were 100 μm apart. Note that the lack of venular response to capillary uncaging (second bar) was rescued by direct venular uncaging (third bar). The baseline endothelial Ca2+ level was 80 ± 4 nM; n = 4 for each bar. Mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 compared with baseline.