Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Marina Ostroukhova, Zengbiao Qi, Timothy B. Oriss, Barbara Dixon-McCarthy, rabir Ray,, Anuradha Ray
Published in Volume 116, Issue 4
J Clin Invest. 2006; 116(4):996–1004 doi:10.1172/JCI26490
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 8
Neutralization of Notch1 prevents active suppression by adoptively transferred TGF-βm+ cells.

(A) Experimental setup. Anti-Notch1 antibody (50 μg/mouse) or matching isotype control was administrated i.p. into recipient animals 1 hour before OVA/alum injection (days 21 and 27) or aerosol challenge (day 35). Control mice were immunized with OVA/alum (airway inflammation) or subjected to the tolerance protocol and challenged with aerosolized OVA. Twenty-four hours after the last OVA challenge, mice were processed for different endpoints. (B) Shown are analysis of IgE in sera and IgA, and cytokine levels (IL-5, IL-13, IL-10 [undetectable] and TGF-β1) and cell differentials in BALF obtained from 6 groups of animals. Total TGF-β1 levels were measured after acid treatment of BALF. Active TGF-β1, measured in the absence of acid treatment, was detected at approximately 100 pg/ml only in the BALF of mice that received TGF-βm+ cells (lanes 3 and 6). *P < 0.05, TGF-βm+ recipients that also received anti-Notch1 antibody versus mice that received TGF-βm+ cells alone. (CH) Tissue histology is also shown. Lung infiltrates were of +5 grade in all TGF-βm– cell transfers (F) or in control OVA/OVA–immunized mice (C), between +4 and +5 in mice that received TGF-βm+ cells and anti-Notch1 antibody treatment (G), compared with grades between +1 and +2 in mice that received TGF-βm+ cells alone (E) or isotype control (H), or in tolerized mice (D). There were 3 mice per group, and the results are representative of 2 independent experiments. Ag, antigen. Magnification, ×40.