Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Terry F. Davies, Takao Ando, Reigh-Yi Lin, Yaron Tomer, Rauf Latif
Published in Volume 115, Issue 8
J Clin Invest. 2005; 115(8):1972–1983 doi:10.1172/JCI26031
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 6

A hypothetical model simplified to explain the effect of structural changes in the TSH-binding site by diverse TSHR antibodies. The TSH-binding pocket, represented by the LRRs, is shown by spirals representing the α helix and the β pleated sheets represented by the wide red arrows. The gray region represents the unique cleaved region (316–366 aa) of the receptor. (A) Epitope A1 represents the site where thyroid-stimulating antibodies bind in part to the LRRs, bringing about a structural change in the receptor that leads to signal transduction; Epitope A2 represents a similar competing site, where TSH-blocking antibodies bind (both illustrated as a best fit). (B) Epitope B is the least common site, where TSHR-blocking antibodies may bind but do not compete with antibodies binding to Epitope A. They bind in part to the LRR region but do not bring about the required structural change for signal transduction yet are still able to hinder TSH binding to this site (illustrated as a good fit). (C) Epitope C is where neutral antibodies bind to the cleaved region and/or the N terminus of the TSHR ectodomain, bringing no appropriate structural alteration to the TSHR and thus leaving the LRR region free for TSH, and other TSHR antibodies, to bind. Thus, neutral antibodies result in no signal transduction and do not block TSH binding (illustrated as no fit).