Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Roger P.M. Sutmuller, Martijn H.M.G.M. den Brok, Matthijs Kramer, Erik J. Bennink, Liza W.J. Toonen, Bart-Jan Kullberg, Leo A. Joosten, Shizuo Akira, Mihai G. Netea, Gosse J. Adema
Published in Volume 116, Issue 2
J Clin Invest. 2006; 116(2):485–494 doi:10.1172/JCI25439
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 4
Phenotype of PAM-expanded Treg.

Expression of intrinsic Treg specific markers on PAM-expanded resting (7 days after stimulation with PAM) Tregs was analyzed by flow cytometry and quantitative PCR. (A) The PAM-expanded Tregs expressed the markers CD4, CD25, GITR, CTLA-4, and CD103 (indicated by thick gray, lines; corresponding isotype controls are indicated by thin, black lines). CTLA-4 was detected by standard intracellular staining procedure. (B) Expression (expr.) of Foxp3 (left panel) and TLR2 (right panel) mRNA by resting PAM-expanded Tregs and conventional CD25 T helper cells was determined by quantitative PCR. The quantitative PCR results are indicated as mean relative mRNA expression from 3 replicate measurements (shown as arbitrary units relative to PBGD) ± SD. (C) Expression of Foxp3 (left panel) and TLR2 (right panel) protein determined by flow cytometry on resting PAM-expanded T cells (Tregs, gray lines; conventional T helper cells, black lines) as well as freshly isolated T cells (CD4+CD25+ Tregs, gray lines; CD4+CD25 Th cells, black lines). Corresponding isotype controls are indicated by the dotted lines. Representative results from 2 experiments are shown.