Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Qiwei Zhang, Nico Mousdicas, Qiaofang Yi, Mohammed Al-Hassani, Steven D. Billings, Susan M. Perkins, Katherine M. Howard, Satoshi Ishii, Takao Shimizu, Jeffrey B. Travers
Published in Volume 115, Issue 10
J Clin Invest. 2005; 115(10):2855–2861 doi:10.1172/JCI25429
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 4

Involvement of IL-10 in PAF-R–mediated suppression of DTH. (A) Effect of CPAF or LTA injection on epidermal IL-10 levels. Dorsal sides of ears of wild-type or PAF-R–/– mice were injected with 100 ng CPAF, 10 μg LTA, or vehicle control and the tissue harvested at various times. Immunohistochemistry was used to measure epidermal IL-10 levels. Depicted are representative sections 72 hours after treatment with CPAF, LTA, or vehicle control. Magnification, ×400. (B) Effect of a neutralizing anti–IL-10 antibody on CPAF-mediated inhibition of DTH reactions. Wild-type mice were injected with 250 ng CPAF or BSA vehicle control i.p.; 4 and 24 hours later, the mice were injected i.p. with 100 μg neutralizing rat anti-mouse IL-10 or 100 μg rat IgG1 or BSA vehicle. Five days later, the mice were sensitized with DNFB, then 9 days later challenged by painting DNFB on 1 ear and vehicle control on the other. Punch biopsies were performed and specimens weighed 24 hours later. The data represent the mean ± SD difference in ear specimen weights from 7–8 mice. *Statistically significant (P < 0.05) inhibition of DNFB-mediated DTH by CPAF treatment. It should be noted that treatment with a neutralizing anti–IL-10 antibody but not isotype IgG1 antibody control abolished CPAF-mediated inhibition of DTH reaction.