Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Qiwei Zhang, Nico Mousdicas, Qiaofang Yi, Mohammed Al-Hassani, Steven D. Billings, Susan M. Perkins, Katherine M. Howard, Satoshi Ishii, Takao Shimizu, Jeffrey B. Travers
Published in Volume 115, Issue 10
J Clin Invest. 2005; 115(10):2855–2861 doi:10.1172/JCI25429
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 3

Effects of CPAF and LTA on topical DTH reactions in wild-type versus PAF-R–/– mice. (A) Effect of CPAF/LTA on DTH sensitization reactions. 250 ng CPAF or 100 μg LTA was injected i.p. into wild-type or PAF-R–/– mice. As described in Methods, the mice underwent sensitization to topical DNFB 5 days later, and 10 days later reactions were elicited by painting DNFB or vehicle on ears. Punch biopsies were performed 24 hours later, and the differences between biopsy specimen weights of DNFB- and vehicle-treated ears were measured using 6–8 mice in each group. (B) Effects of CPAF and LTA on DTH elicitation reactions. In these experiments, the mice were first sensitized to topical DNFB. Nine days after immunization, 250 ng CPAF or 100 μg LTA was injected i.p.; 1 day after injection, DTH reactions were elicited by painting DNFB or vehicle control on ears. Punch biopsies were performed 24 hours later, and the differences between biopsy specimen weights of DNFB- and vehicle-treated ears were measured using 7–8 mice in each group. *Statistically significant (P < 0.05) decrease in difference of ear biopsy specimen weights of CPAF- or LTA-treated PAF-R–/– mice in comparison with wild-type mice.