Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Adam M. Boruchov, Glenn Heller, Maria-Concetta Veri, Ezio Bonvini, Jeffrey V. Ravetch, James W. Young
Published in Volume 115, Issue 10
J Clin Invest. 2005; 115(10):2914–2923 doi:10.1172/JCI24772
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 3

Various stimuli modulate the balanced expression of CD32a and CD32b on immature moDCs. The indicated reagents were added to cultures of immature moDCs from day 3 to day 6. Expression of FcγRs was measured by flow cytometry (CD16 and CD64 not shown). Analyzed cells were immature or specifically gated for the absence of CD83 in cultures where there was a small amount of maturation (PGE2 and TNF-α). The mean fold changes (± SD) in the frequency of cells expressing a given FcγR induced by each reagent, compared with untreated cells, are shown in A. Density was calculated on the FcγR+ cells as the number of anti-FcγR antibodies bound per cell using a commercially available kit. The mean fold changes (±SD) in FcγR density induced by the reagents in 5 independent experiments, compared with the averaged FcγR densities on untreated/control moDCs, are shown in B. Sample histograms for untreated immature moDCs and IFN-γ–treated immature moDCs are shown in C. Open histograms correspond to isotype controls, and filled histograms show staining by the indicated anti-FcγR mAbs.