Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Leander Grode, Peter Seiler, Sven Baumann, Jürgen Hess, Volker Brinkmann, Ali Nasser Eddine, Peggy Mann, Christian Goosmann, Silke Bandermann, Debbie Smith, Gregory J. Bancroft, Jean-Marc Reyrat, Dick van Soolingen, Bärbel Raupach, Stefan H.E. Kaufmann
Published in Volume 115, Issue 9
J Clin Invest. 2005; 115(9):2472–2479 doi:10.1172/JCI24617
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 2

Greater protection against M. tuberculosis aerosol challenge by vaccination with hly+ rBCG+ and ΔureC hly+ rBCG. (A) BALB/c mice were vaccinated with hly+ rBCG (triangles) or parental BCG (circles) or left naive (squares). At day 120 after vaccination, mice were aerosol challenged with 200 CFU of M. tuberculosis H37Rv. P = 0.016 (Mann-Whitney U test) for hly+ rBCG compared with parental BCG at day 150 after infection (p.i.). Shown is 1 representative experiment of 2. The mean of results from 7 mice is shown (± SEM). (B and C) BALB/c mice were vaccinated with ΔureC hly+ rBCG (diamonds) or parental BCG (circles) or left naive (squares). At day 120 after vaccination, mice were aerosol challenged with 30 CFU (B) and 200 CFU (C) of M. tuberculosis H37Rv. M. tuberculosis load in lung was determined at the indicated time points. Shown are 2 representative experiments. *P = 0.0012 and **P = 0.001 (Mann-Whitney U test) for ΔureC hly+ rBCG compared with parental BCG at day 90 p.i. The mean of results for 7 mice is shown (± SEM).