Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Bingye Han, Pau Serra, Jun Yamanouchi, Abdelaziz Amrani, John F. Elliott, Peter Dickie, Teresa P. DiLorenzo, Pere Santamaria
Published in Volume 115, Issue 7
J Clin Invest. 2005; 115(7):1879–1887 doi:10.1172/JCI24219
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 4

Striking differences in the developmental biology of 17.4α/8.3β and 17.5α/8.3β T cells in Tg mice. Flow cytometry of thymocytes (AD) and splenocytes (EH). (A and E) Representative CD4 versus CD8 dot plots. P values for percentage of thymic and splenic CD8+CD4 cells were as follows: P < 0.017 (for 17.4α/8.3β Tg vs. 17.5α/8.3β Tg, 5- to 9-week-old mice). (BD and FH) Comparison of mfi with which the different T cell subsets stain with anti–TCR-Vβ8 or anti–TCR-β mAbs or with IGRP206–214 tetramers. Values on the panels correspond to percentage of cells contained within each quadrant (A and E) or to percentage of cells within each gate that stained (BD and FH) (mean ± SE). **P < 0.05 versus 17.4α/8.3β Tg mice. Representative histograms are shown. AD and EH are representative of 4–5 mice per strain per age group. Note that the representative dot plots and histograms corresponding to 17.4α/8.3β Tg mice are the same as those shown in Figure 2. The data are rendered twice to facilitate comparisons with results obtained with Tg mice bearing lower- (Figure 2) or higher-avidity T cells (this figure).