Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Bingye Han, Pau Serra, Jun Yamanouchi, Abdelaziz Amrani, John F. Elliott, Peter Dickie, Teresa P. DiLorenzo, Pere Santamaria
Published in Volume 115, Issue 7
J Clin Invest. 2005; 115(7):1879–1887 doi:10.1172/JCI24219
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 2

Developmental biology of 17.6α/8.3β versus 17.4α/8.3β TCRs in Tg mice. Flow cytometry of thymocytes (AD) and splenocytes (EH). (A and E) Representative CD4 versus CD8 dot plots. P values for thymic and splenic CD4:CD8 ratios were P < 0.0001 (for 17.4α/8.3β TCR-Tg vs. non-Tg mice) and P < 0.03 (for 17.6α/8.3β TCR-Tg vs. non-Tg mice). (BD and FH) Comparison of the intensity with which the different T cell subsets stain with anti–TCR-Vβ8 or anti–TCR-β mAbs or with IGRP206–214 tetramers. Values on the panels correspond to percentage of cells contained within each quadrant (A and E) or to percentage of cells within each gate that stained (BD and FH; only values for the 2 Tg strains are shown in these panels for ease of comparison) (mean ± SE). **P < 0.05 vs. 17.4α/8.3β Tg mice. Representative histograms are shown. AD and EH represent 3–6 mice per strain.