Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Zoltán Benyó, Andreas Gille, Jukka Kero, Marion Csiky, Marie Catherine Suchánková, Rolf M. Nüsing, Alexandra Moers, Klaus Pfeffer, Stefan Offermanns
Published in Volume 115, Issue 12
J Clin Invest. 2005; 115(12):3634–3640 doi:10.1172/JCI23626
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 3

NA-induced flushing involves EP2, EP4, and DP but not IP. (AD) Original recordings of the flushing response to nicotinic acid (200 mg/kg i.p.) in DP–/– (A), EP2–/– (B), EP4–/– (C), and IP–/– mice (D). (E) Quantitative analysis of the percentage of LDF increase in response to NA in wild-type control animals (n = 27) and the indicated mutants (n = 6–15). *P = 0.013; ***P < 0.001 vs. control (contr.).