Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Gennadi V. Glinsky, Olga Berezovska, Anna B. Glinskii
Published in Volume 115, Issue 6
J Clin Invest. 2005; 115(6):1503–1521 doi:10.1172/JCI23412
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 4

Selection of the best-performing small signature based on evaluation of the metastatic-phenotype-discrimination performance and therapy-outcome prediction power of candidate prognostic signatures. Expression profiles of the 3 small signatures (11-gene MTTS/PNS signature, AC; 11-gene MTTS/CNS signature, DF; and 14-gene MTTS/PNS/CNS signature, GI) were evaluated in metastatic lesions at multiple distant target organs and primary prostate carcinomas in the TRAMP transgenic mouse model of prostate cancer (A, D, and G) and prostate cancer patients (B, E, and H) for presence of a stem cell–like expression profile. (B, E, and H) Data from the analysis of 9 distant metastatic lesions and 23 primary human prostate carcinoma samples. (C, F, and I) Kaplan-Meier analysis of the probability that patients would remain disease-free among 21 prostate cancer patients constituting clinical outcome set 1, according to whether they had a good-prognosis or a poor-prognosis signature as defined by the expression profiles of the small prognostic signatures. The y axes in A, B, D, E, G, and H show the SPAI values in corresponding metastatic and primary tumor samples (see Methods for a description of SPAI definition and calculation). CI, confidence interval.