Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Joseph A. Kovacs, Richard A. Lempicki, Igor A. Sidorov, Joseph W. Adelsberger, Irini Sereti, William Sachau, Grace Kelly, Julia A. Metcalf, Richard T. Davey Jr., Judith Falloon, Michael A. Polis, Jorge Tavel, Randy Stevens, Laurie Lambert, Douglas A. Hosack, Marjorie Bosche, Haleem J. Issaq, Stephen D. Fox, Susan Leitman, Michael W. Baseler, Henry Masur, Michele Di Mascio, Dimiter S. Dimitrov, H. Clifford Lane
Published in Volume 115, Issue 8
J Clin Invest. 2005; 115(8):2139–2148 doi:10.1172/JCI23196
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 5

Deuterium labeling kinetics in naive (CD27+CD45RO) cells in patients receiving IL-2. The left panels show the measured data (symbols) and the fitting by the model equations (solid lines) for patients 3, 5, and 6 following an early cycle (blue) and a later cycle (red), and for patients 1 and 2 following the single late IL-2 cycle; the right panels show the probability density function of the normal distribution of log d multiplied by the total source of labeled cells (S). Mean log decay md values for these data are (early/late): –1.16/–2.52, –1.35/–2.61, and –1.49/–2.14 for patients 3, 5, and 6, respectively (P = 0.039 for early vs. late, Student’s t test), and –2.72 and –3.52 for patients 1 and 2, respectively. No significant change was seen in the mean log decay md for the other CD4 subsets or for any of the CD8 subsets for patients 3, 5, and 6. Average values for mean log decay md for these subsets were as follows (early/late): CD4 central memory (CD27+CD45RO+), –0.54/–0.70; CD4 effector memory (CD27CD45RO+), –0.59/–0.74; CD8 naive (CD27+CD45RO), –1.00/–1.90; CD8 central memory (CD27+CD45RO+), –0.82/–1.26; CD8 effector memory (CD27CD45RO+), –0.19/–0.36; CD8 effector memory (CD27CD45RO), –1.02/–1.13.