Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Joseph A. Kovacs, Richard A. Lempicki, Igor A. Sidorov, Joseph W. Adelsberger, Irini Sereti, William Sachau, Grace Kelly, Julia A. Metcalf, Richard T. Davey Jr., Judith Falloon, Michael A. Polis, Jorge Tavel, Randy Stevens, Laurie Lambert, Douglas A. Hosack, Marjorie Bosche, Haleem J. Issaq, Stephen D. Fox, Susan Leitman, Michael W. Baseler, Henry Masur, Michele Di Mascio, Dimiter S. Dimitrov, H. Clifford Lane
Published in Volume 115, Issue 8
J Clin Invest. 2005; 115(8):2139–2148 doi:10.1172/JCI23196
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 3

Slower decay of deuterium labeling in CD4 but not CD8 cells after later cycles of IL-2. (A and C) Mean log decay shifted to the left for CD4 cells (A) but not CD8 cells (C) in 5 of 6 patients, indicating a longer average survival of CD4 cells (but not CD8 cells) following later IL-2 cycles (3 to 6) compared to earlier cycles (1 to 3). Patient 3 had an infusion of 2H-glucose before beginning IL-2 therapy (green diamonds), and patient 5 received a third infusion during his fourth IL-2 cycle (purple circles). The solid lines represent the fitting by the model equations. (B and D) The probability density function of the normal distribution of log d multiplied by the total source of labeled cells (S). Mean log decay rate constants for CD4/CD8 cells for the patients are, respectively: pt. 3, –0.59/0.06 (no IL-2), –0.33/–0.91 (cycle 1), –1.79/–0.68 (cycle 6); pt. 5, –1.03/–0.95 (cycle 1), –1.80/–1.30 (cycle 3), –1.86/–1.39 (cycle 4); pt. 6, –0.09/–2.05 (cycle 2), –1.73/–2.19 (cycle 4); pt. 7, –0.45/–1.01 (cycle 2), –0.94/–1.07 (cycle 5); pt. 8, –1.07/–2.18 (cycle 3), –2.30/–2.20 (cycle 4); pt. 10, –1.14/–0.95 (cycle 1), –0.66/–0.92 (cycle 3).