Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Haruka Okamoto, Silvana Obici, Domenico Accili, Luciano Rossetti
Published in Volume 115, Issue 5
J Clin Invest. 2005; 115(5):1314–1322 doi:10.1172/JCI23096
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 2

Impact of Insr genotype on energy balance. (A) Body composition of 2- to 3-month-old L1 (white bars) and WT (black bars) mice (n = 5 each). Fat mass is significantly decreased and free-fat mass is increased in L1 versus WT mice. *P = 0.05. (B) Daily food intake was similar in both groups. (C) VO2 in L1 mice was significantly increased compared with that in WT mice. **P = 0.016. (D) Twenty-four–hour average resting RQ was significantly decreased in L1 mice versus WT mice. #P = 0.03. (E) PRCF from 24-hour calorimetry measurements. L1 mice (filled circles) display a consistent shift of RQ toward lower values compared to WT mice (crosses). Each curve is derived from 770 measurements of RQ from L1 and WT mice (n = 9 mice per group). (F) Activity measured as horizontal movement recorded over 24-hour period in L1 (thick line) and WT (thin line) mice. The values represent mean ± SEM.