Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Andrea Hoffmann, Gadi Pelled, Gadi Turgeman, Peter Eberle, Yoram Zilberman, Hadassah Shinar, Keren Keinan-Adamsky, Andreas Winkel, Sandra Shahab, Gil Navon, Gerhard Gross, Dan Gazit
Published in Volume 116, Issue 4
J Clin Invest. 2006; 116(4):940–952 doi:10.1172/JCI22689
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 2
Smad8 L+MH2 elicits a tenocyte-like morphology in C3H10T1/2-BMP2 cells, but not in C3H10T1/2-TGFβ1 or C3H10T1/2-GDF5 cells.

Histological analysis (ALP) and phase-contrast microscopy. All cells represent day 11 after confluence. As shown in Figure 1A, the expression of Smad8 L+MH2 led to an elongated tenocyte-like phenotype. This phenotype was not observed when Smad8 L+MH2 was expressed in parental C3H10T1/2 cells or in cells that stably express TGFβ1 or GDF5. TGFβ1 expression led to a dense multilayer growth, but neither osteo- and/or chondrogenic differentiation in vitro nor the formation of tenocyte-like cells in the presence of Smad8 L+MH2 was observed. Stable expression of GDF5 only allowed monolayer growth exhibiting large cellular phenotypes. Smad8 L+MH2 expression did not change this cellular phenotype. RT-PCR analyses show recombinant expression of TGFβ1 or GDF5 in the various cell lines. Western blot analyses show recombinant expression of Smad8 L+MH2 in the recombinant C3H10T1/2 lines.