Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Xingjun Jing, Dai-Qing Li, Charlotta S. Olofsson, Albert Salehi, Vikas V. Surve, José Caballero, Rosita Ivarsson, Ingmar Lundquist, Alexey Pereverzev, Toni Schneider, Patrik Rorsman, Erik Renström
Published in Volume 115, Issue 1
J Clin Invest. 2005; 115(1):146–154 doi:10.1172/JCI22518
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 2

Effects of CaV2.3 ablation on single-cell exocytosis in islet cells. (A) Exocytosis evoked by trains of 10 depolarizations (V) and monitored as increases in cell capacitance (ØC) in WT CaV2.3+/+ (black) and CaV2.3–/– (gray) β cells. (B) Average total increase in capacitance evoked by the trains (ØCTOT). Data are mean values ± SEM in 6 WT (black bars) and 7 CaV2.3–/– (gray bars) β cells. *P < 0.05. (C) ØC evoked by intracellular dialysis of a Ca2+-containing patch electrode solution (free [Ca2+]i, approximately 1.5 μM) in WT (black) and CaV2.3–/– (gray) β cells. (D) Average rates of exocytosis (ØCt) ± SEM evoked by Ca2+ dialysis in 10 WT (black bars) and 10 CaV2.3–/– (gray bars) β cells. (E and F) Exocytosis and average ØC were recorded as in A and B, but results are from α cells, and averages represent 5 WT (black) and 3 CaV2.3–/– (gray) α cells. (G and H) ΔC and average rates of exocytosis were recorded as in C and D, but the data are from α cells, and mean responses are from 6 WT (black) and 3 CaV2.3–/– (gray) α cells. pF, picofarads.