Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Eiki Takimoto, Hunter C. Champion, Manxiang Li, Shuxun Ren, E. Rene Rodriguez, Barbara Tavazzi, Giuseppe Lazzarino, Nazareno Paolocci, Kathleen L. Gabrielson, Yibin Wang, David A. Kass
Published in Volume 115, Issue 5
J Clin Invest. 2005; 115(5):1221–1231 doi:10.1172/JCI21968
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 2

In vivo hemodynamics in WT and NOS3–/– hearts subjected to TAC. (A) Representative PV loops and end-systolic and end-diastolic relations (dashed lines). In WT TAC hearts, the PV relations shifted rightward modestly at 3 weeks and markedly at 9 weeks, whereas the opposite occurred in NOS3–/– TAC hearts. LV systolic pressures at 3 weeks were similarly increased. The end-systolic PV relation (upper left relation) was steeper in NOS3–/– TAC than in WT TAC hearts. Comprehensive analysis is provided in Table 1. (B) M-mode echocardiography in conscious animals demonstrating dilated hypertrophy with decreased FS in WT TAC but concentric hypertrophy with preserved shortening in NOS3–/– TAC hearts. (C) Summary data from echocardiography (n = 5 or more per group). Wall thickness increases similarly by TAC at 3 weeks between genotypes and, at a 9 weeks, decreases slightly in WT and remains unchanged in NOS3–/– hearts. Chamber end-diastolic dimension (EDD) and end-systolic dimension (ESD) and percent FS markedly differed between the genotypes. P values shown indicate the effect of genotype on the TAC-stimulated response (2–way ANOVA).