Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Supriya Srinivasan, Cecile Lubrano-Berthelier, Cedric Govaerts, Franck Picard, Pamela Santiago, Bruce R. Conklin, Christian Vaisse
Published in Volume 114, Issue 8
J Clin Invest. 2004; 114(8):1158–1164 doi:10.1172/JCI21927
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 2

N-terminal MC4R mutation does not impair ligand action. WT and mutant MC4Rs were transiently transfected into HEK293 cells stably expressing luciferase under the control of a cAMP response element promoter. Cells were stimulated with increasing amounts of α-MSH (A and B) or with α-MSH 10–8 M and increasing concentrations of AGRP (C and D), and luci ferase activity was measured to generate dose response curves. Data were normalized to maximal α-MSH stimulation after subtraction of basal activity and were fitted by nonlinear regression. Each point represents the mean ± SEM of at least two independent experiments. The best-fit estimate of the EC50 (A and B) or the IC50 (C and D) and their 95% confidence intervals are indicated for each data set. There was no statistical difference between the WT EC50 and EC50 for each of the mutants (A and B) nor between the WT IC50 and IC50 for each of the mutants (C and D; for all in AD, P > 0.05 in an F test under the null hypothesis “log EC50/IC50 same for WT and mutants”). RLU, relative luminescence units.