Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Vanesa C. Sanchez, Jorge Goldstein, Ronald C. Stuart, Virginia Hovanesian, Lihong Huo, Heike Munzberg, Theodore C. Friedman, Christian Bjorbaek, Eduardo A. Nillni
Published in Volume 114, Issue 3
J Clin Invest. 2004; 114(3):357–369 doi:10.1172/JCI21620
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 8

Fasting alters the posttranslational processing of proTRH. The scheme in A represents a portion of the original processing model for proTRH, where the formation of N-terminal peptide 24 is indicated by the action of PC1 and PC2. The small arrows indicate the sites where PC1 and PC2 produce their enzymatic cleavages. The size of PC1 and PC2 lettering indicates relative activity at a given site. Large arrows indicate the order of processing. (B) An electrophoretic separation on a Tricine SDS-polyacrylamide gel of PVN and ME samples extracted from fed, fasted, and fasted-plus-leptin animals was followed by acid extraction of gel slices and RIA against pEH24 peptide. This RIA recognizes 3 N-terminal moieties derived from proTRH processing, the 15-, 3.8-, and 2.8-kDa (pEH24) forms depicted in A. Molecular masses of the identified peaks are indicated based on the migration of standards and iodinated synthetic pEH24 peptide. These figures represent a typical profile of 3 independent experiments.