Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Utpal Pal, Xiaofeng Yang, Manchuan Chen, Linda K. Bockenstedt, John F. Anderson, Richard A. Flavell, Michael V. Norgard, Erol Fikrig
Published in Volume 113, Issue 2
J Clin Invest. 2004; 113(2):220–230 doi:10.1172/JCI19894
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 1

OspC binds to I. scapularis salivary glands. (a) FITC-labeled OspC (black bars), ErpT from B. burgdorferi N40 (white bars), and BSA (gray bars) were used to probe SGE- or FBS-coated wells. Data represent the OD450 at 15 minutes (mean ± SEM, n = 3). The differences between the binding of OspC to SGE and its binding to BSA or ErpT are highly significant (P < 0.001). (b) Direct binding of FITC-labeled OspC to the intact unfixed tick salivary gland was detected using confocal microscopy. FITC-labeled ErpT and FITC-labeled BSA were used as controls. After the tick salivary gland was probed with FITC-labeled protein (shown in green), the tissues were stained with propidium iodide to localize the nuclei of the salivary gland cells (shown in red). The objects stained green in the ErpT and BSA panels are not a part of the salivary gland. The endogenous weak green fluorescence of tick salivary glands was adjusted in the confocal microscope to compare the binding of different FITC-labeled antigens. The FITC and propidium iodide images were examined at ×400 magnification and are presented as merged images for clarity (n = 3).