Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Yang Feng-Chun, David A. Ingram, Shi Chen, Cynthia M. Hingtgen, Nancy Ratner, Kelly R. Monk, Travis Clegg, Hilary White, Laura Mead, Mary Jo Wenning, David A. Williams, Reuben Kapur, Simon J. Atkinson, D. Wade Clapp
Published in Volume 112, Issue 12
J Clin Invest. 2003; 112(12):1851–1861 doi:10.1172/JCI19195
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 3

Quantification of the concentration of KitL in Schwann cell CM and the effect of pharmacologic or genetic inhibition of c-kit activity on mast cell migration to Schwann cell CM. (a) Concentration of murine KitL in WT, Nf1+/–, and Nf1–/– Schwann cell CM was determined by ELISA. Results represent the mean ± SEM of five independent collections from five independent Schwann cell cultures. *P < 0.05 for Nf1–/– versus WT or Nf1–/– versus Nf1+/– by the Student’s paired t test. (b) WT and Nf1+/– mast cells (2 × 105) were preincubated with a neutralizing Ab to the c-kit RTK, and haptotaxis assays were performed to either WT or Nf1–/– Schwann cell CM. Results represent the mean ± SEM of five independent experiments. *P < 0.05 for WT mast cell migration in response to WT or Nf1–/– Schwann cell CM in the presence or absence of the c-kit–neutralizing Ab. **P < 0.05 for Nf1+/– mast cell migration in response to WT or Nf1–/– Schwann cell CM in the presence or absence of the c-kit–neutralizing Ab by the Student’s paired t test. (c) Haptotaxis of mast cells of the four Nf1 and W genotypes in response to either 2 × 105 WT or Nf1–/– Schwann cell CM. Results represent the mean ± SEM of five independent experiments. *P < 0.05 for W41/W41 versus WT mast cell migration in response to either WT or Nf1–/– Schwann cell CM. **P < 0.05 for Nf1+/–; W41/W41 versus Nf1+/– mast cell migration in response to either WT or Nf1–/– Schwann cell CM by the Student’s paired t test.