Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Gilles Faury, Mylène Pezet, Russell H. Knutsen, Walter A. Boyle, Scott P. Heximer, Sean E. McLean, Robert K. Minkes, Kendall J. Blumer, Attila Kovacs, Daniel P. Kelly, Dean Y. Li, Barry Starcher, Robert P. Mecham
Published in Volume 112, Issue 9
J Clin Invest. 2003; 112(9):1419–1428 doi:10.1172/JCI19028
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 5

Vascular IDs are similar at physiological blood pressures of Eln+/– and Eln+/+ genotypes. Comparison of ascending aorta IDs of Eln+/+ and Eln+/– mice at their respective physiological pressures shows that the vessel in Eln+/– animals is smaller at every intravascular pressure. Because the basal blood pressure in the Eln+/– genotype is higher, however, its effective working diameter (open arrows) is comparable to that of the wild-type animal (filled arrows). Solid lines show the working diameter of the wild-type artery at its physiological systolic (S) and diastolic (D) pressures (120/80). Dotted lines show that the systolic (s) and diastolic (d) dimensions of the Eln+/– artery at its higher pressures (160/105) are similar to the wild-type values.