Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Cyrus J. Parsa, Akio Matsumoto, Jihee Kim, Ryan U. Riel, Laura S. Pascal, G. Brant Walton, Richard B. Thompson, Jason A. Petrofski, Brian H. Annex, Jonathan S. Stamler, Walter J. Koch
Published in Volume 112, Issue 7
J Clin Invest. 2003; 112(7):999–1007 doi:10.1172/JCI18200
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 5

LV area at risk quantification after ischemia/reperfusion. (a) Graphic representation of the LV infarction size measured as the percentage of infarct of total ischemic area at risk in MI + saline (control) rabbits (black bar, n = 5) and MI + EPO rabbits (white bar, n = 5). The LV area at risk was virtually identical in both groups (see Results). Data are the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.005 versus MI + saline. (b) Representative LV cross sections from a MI + saline (control) rabbit and (c) from a MI + EPO rabbit. The dark blue–stained areas are nonischemic tissue, and red-stained areas represent the ischemic LV area at risk. Infarcted areas are indicated by blanched (yellow-white) areas within this area at risk, with much less seen in the MI + EPO heart (c).