Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Steven P. Zielske, Jane S. Reese, Karen T. Lingas, Jon R. Donze, Stanton L. Gerson
Published in Volume 112, Issue 10
J Clin Invest. 2003; 112(10):1561–1570 doi:10.1172/JCI17922
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 7

Repopulation analysis. Genome and MGMT copies were determined in individual CFUs as described in Methods and plotted as shown. (a) CFUs from a mixture of two K562 clones containing integrated provirus were analyzed by real-time PCR, and the numbers of MGMT copies versus genome copies were plotted for each sample. Solid lines indicate linear regression, and dashed lines are the 95% confidence intervals. (b) Data from CFUs obtained from CD34+ mass cultures and before transplant show scattered distribution of data points. (c) Data from human CFUs obtained from four twice-treated mice. Two lines were distinguishable in mice nos. 21 and 22, indicating CFU populations clustering around two different copy-number distributions. Data from mouse no. 23 were insufficient to discern multiple lines, and mouse no. 24 gave a single line, probably indicating a monoclonal population. Triangles represent points not included in the linear regressions. Regressions were obtained by separately combining data points represented using circles or squares. One to 4 points are off scale in the in vitro, mouse no. 21, and mouse no. 22 plots and were not included in the analysis.