Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Andrew B. Adams, Matthew A. Williams, Thomas R. Jones, Nozomu Shirasugi, Megan M. Durham, Susan M. Kaech, E. John Wherry, Thandi Onami, J. Gibson Lanier, Kenneth E. Kokko, Thomas C. Pearson, Rafi Ahmed, Christian P. Larsen
Published in Volume 111, Issue 12
J Clin Invest. 2003; 111(12):1887–1895 doi:10.1172/JCI17477
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 2

A critical number of CD8+ central memory T cells are needed to resist tolerance. Naive B6 mice (CD45.2) received T cells from sensitized congenic B6 mice (CD45.1). (a) Titration of memory cell numbers. Naive recipients received varying doses of T cells (calculated number of memory cells transferred in brackets) from sensitized hosts (2 × 107 [400,000], filled squares; 107 [200,000], filled diamonds; 5 × 106 [100,000], filled triangles; 2 × 106 [40,000], open diamonds; 106 [20,000], open triangles; 2 × 107 naive cells [none], open squares). (b) CD8+ memory T cells represent a potent barrier to tolerance induction. Purified CD4+, CD8+, or whole T cells were isolated from sensitized mice and transferred to naive congenic mice. Mice receiving either naive selected cells (data not shown) or CD4+ T cells (filled diamonds) from sensitized donors developed high-level donor cell chimerism and accepted donor-type skin grafts indefinitely. The transfer of CD8+ T cells (filled triangles) from sensitized animals prevented tolerance induction in a similar fashion to transferred whole T cells (filled squares) (MST, 21 days). (c) CD8+ central memory T cells promote rejection more efficiently than “effector” memory T cells. Equal numbers of CD8+ (open squares), CD8+ CD62Lhi (filled squares), or CD8+ CD62Llo (open triangles) antigen-specific memory T cells were transferred to naive congenic hosts, which were then subjected to the tolerance protocol (control naive CD8+ T cells, filled triangles). Both unseparated CD8+ memory T cells and central CD8+ memory T cells efficiently rejected allogeneic skin grafts in less than 3 weeks (MST, 21 and 18 days, respectively). In contrast, effector memory T cells of the traditional CD62Llo memory phenotype were less effective at promoting rejection (MST, more than 70 days; P < 0.01).