Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Sara K. Hansen, Marcelina Párrizas, Maria L. Jensen, Stepanka Pruhova, Jakob Ek, Sylvia F. Boj, Anders Johansen, Miguel A. Maestro, Francisca Rivera, Hans Eiberg, Michal Andel, Jan Lebl, Oluf Pedersen, Jorge Ferrer, Torben Hansen
Published in Volume 110, Issue 6
J Clin Invest. 2002; 110(6):827–833 doi:10.1172/JCI15085
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 3

HNF-1α binding affinity in wild-type and mutant human P2 promoter oligonucleotides. (a) Schematic illustration of oligonucleotides containing the human HNF-4α P2 promoter HNF1 site (bold), and sites containing either the –181G→A mutation (P2 HNF1G→Α) or an artificial mutation intended to completely disrupt HNF1 binding (P2 HNF1→SAC). Mutated bases are in lower case. (b) EMSA of radiolabeled wild-type HNF1 probe. Lanes 1 and 2: incubation with translation reactions using empty vector and pCMVTag-HNF1α, respectively. Lane 2 represents the maximal binding obtained in the absence of any cold competitor. Lanes 3–11: same as 2, except for preincubation with the indicated unlabeled probes at 1×, 10×, and 100× excess relative to the labeled probe. Lanes 12 and 13: same as 2, except for preincubation with either anti–HNF-1α or preimmune antisera, respectively. Similar results were obtained with mouse pancreatic nuclear extracts (not shown). (c) Results from two experiments such as the one shown in b were used to calculate oligonucleotide concentrations required for half-maximal displacement (HNF1G→A, 9.67 ± 1.45 nM; HNF1, 1.36 ± 0.22 nM). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.