Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Cornel Badorff, Hartmut Ruetten, Sven Mueller, Meike Stahmer, Doris Gehring, Frank Jung, Christian Ihling, Andreas M. Zeiher, Stefanie Dimmeler
Published in Volume 109, Issue 3
J Clin Invest. 2002; 109(3):373–381 doi:10.1172/JCI13779
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 6

Fas ligand is dispensable for pressure overload hypertrophy in vivo, and Fas receptor mediates Fas ligand–independent signaling. (a) Echocardiographic left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) and end-systolic diameter (LVESD) of gld mice at base line (left, n = 4) and 14 days after induction of pressure overload (right, n = 8). The mean ± SEM is shown. *P ≤ 0.05 for aortic banding versus control. (b) Echocardiographic septal (white bars) and posterior wall (black bars) thicknesses of gld mice at base line (left, n = 4) and 14 days after induction of pressure overload (right, n = 8). The mean ± SEM is shown. *P ≤ 0.05 for aortic banding versus control. (c) Representative photomicrographs (×400) of wild-type (top) or Fas-deficient lpr (bottom) mouse neonatal cardiomyocytes unstimulated (left) or stimulated with either Fas ligand (middle) or angiotensin II (Ang II; right) at the indicated concentrations for 48 hours. A typical experiment is presented. (d) Maximal cell length (left panel) and cell surface area (right panel) of wild-type (white bars) and lpr cardiomyocytes (black bars). n = 10 randomly chosen cells per group. *P ≤ 0.01 for stimulation versus control; #P ≤ 0.01 for wild-type versus lpr.