Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Yasutada Akiba, Osamu Furukawa, Paul H. Guth, Eli Engel, Igor Nastaskin, Pejvak Sassani, Ramanath Dukkipatis, Alexander Pushkin, Ira Kurtz, Jonathan D. Kaunitz
Published in Volume 108, Issue 12
J Clin Invest. 2001; 108(12):1807–1816 doi:10.1172/JCI12218
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 7

Effect of DIDS and NPPB on acid-induced duodenal injury (H&E study). Injury was assessed in control and acid-exposed duodena with the use of conventional histologic sections. (a) Duodenal villi perfused with pH 7.0 solution, (b) pH 2.2 solution, (c) pH 2.0 solution, (d) pH 1.8 solution, (e) pH 2.0 + DIDS, and (f) pH 1.8 + NPPB. Note that DIDS increased mucosal injury, as manifest by focal necrosis seen in e (thin arrows), compared with no injury seen with pH 2.0 alone (c). The sloughing caused by pH 1.8 perfusion (thick arrows), seen in d, was not observed in the presence of NPPB (f), where ballooning (arrowheads), a more mild form of injury, was observed (H&E, ×400; calibration bar, 100 μm).