Article tools
Author information

Research Article

Indirect effect of insulin to suppress endogenous glucose production is dominant, even with hyperglucagonemia.

S D Mittelman, Y Y Fu, K Rebrin, G Steil and R N Bergman

Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA.

Published December 15, 1997

Suppression of endogenous glucose production (EGP) is one of insulin's primary metabolic effects and failure of this action is a major contributor to fasting hyperglycemia of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Classically, insulin was thought to suppress the liver directly, via hyperinsulinemia in the portal vein. Recently, however, we and others have demonstrated that at least part, and possibly most of insulin's action to suppress EGP is normally mediated via an extrahepatic (i.e., indirect) mechanism. We have suggested that this mechanism involves insulin suppression of adipocyte lipolysis, leading to lowered FFA and reduced EGP ("Single Gateway Hypothesis"). Previous studies of the indirect insulin effect from this laboratory were done under conditions of lowered portal glucagon. Because of the possibility that the direct (i.e., portal) effect of insulin may have been underestimated with hypoglucagonemia, these studies examined the relative importance of portal insulin, versus peripheral insulin (administered at one-half the dose to equalize peripheral insulin levels) at four rates of portal glucagon infusion: 0, 0.65 (under-), 1.5 (basal-), and 3.0 ng/kg per min (over-replacement). Portal versus peripheral insulin suppressed steady-state EGP to the same extent (52%), confirming that the primary effect of insulin to suppress EGP is via the peripheral mechanism. This conclusion was maintained regardless of portal glucagonemia, although there was some evidence for an increase in the direct insulin effect at hyperglucagonemia. The indirect effect of insulin is the primary mechanism of steady-state EGP suppression under normal conditions. The direct effect increases with hyperglucagonemia; however, the indirect effect remains predominant even under those conditions.

Articles that cite
this article:

Closed-loop insulin delivery – what lies between where we are and where we are going?
Garry M Steil, Kerstin Rebrin
Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2(2):353. [CrossRef]

The regulation of glucose effectiveness: how glucose modulates its own production
Julia Tonelli, Preeti Kishore, Do-Eun Lee, Meredith Hawkins
8(4):450???456. [CrossRef]

Severe impairment in liver insulin signaling fails to alter hepatic insulin action in conscious mice
Christoph Buettner, Rima Patel, Evan D. Muse, Sanjay Bhanot, Brett P. Monia, Rob Mckay, Silvana Obici, Luciano Rossetti
J Clin Invest 115(5):1306. [CrossRef]

Insulin signaling is required for insulin’s direct and indirect action on hepatic glucose production
Simon J. Fisher, C. Ronald Kahn
J Clin Invest 111(4):463. [CrossRef]

Automated insulin delivery for type 1 diabetes
Garry M Steil, Mohammed F Saad
CURR OPIN ENDOCRINOL DIABETES 13(2):205???211. [CrossRef]

The relationship between peripheral glucose utilisation and insulin sensitivity in the regulation of hepatic glucose production: studies in normal and alloxan-diabetic dogs
M. J. Christopher, C. Rantzau, F. P. Alford
Diabetes Metab Res Rev 22(2):155. [CrossRef]

Lipid-Induced Insulin Resistance in the Liver
Christos S Katsanos
Sports Med 34(14):955. [CrossRef]

Modeling Insulin Action for Development of a Closed-Loop Artificial Pancreas
G.M. Steil, Bud Clark, Sami Kanderian, K. Rebrin
diabetes technol ther 7(1):94. [CrossRef]