Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Joshua W. Knowles, Giovanni Esposito, Lan Mao, John R. Hagaman, Jennifer E. Fox, Oliver Smithies, Howard A. Rockman, Nobuyo Maeda
Published in Volume 107, Issue 8
J Clin Invest. 2001; 107(8):975–984 doi:10.1172/JCI11273
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 8

MAPK activation in Npr1+/+ and Npr1–/– mice. (a) Basal MAPK activity in sham-operated Npr1–/– mice expressed as relative activity of Npr1+/+ mice. Differences between Npr1+/+ and Npr1–/– mice were not significant. Numbers in the bars indicate the number of animals. A subset of animals were used in this analysis. (b) Fold increase of MAPK activity by TAC. Data are expressed as fold induction (± SE) over sham controls of the same genotype. Numbers inside bars represent the number of animals. All four MAPKs were significantly activated versus sham of the same genotype (P < 0.05 by ANOVA with Bonferroni correction). There was no significant difference in activation of any MAPK between Npr1+/+ and Npr1–/– mice after TAC.