Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Andrew T. Gewirtz, Peter O. Simon, Clare K. Schmitt, Laura J. Taylor, Curt H. Hagedorn, Alison D. O’Brien, Andrew S. Neish, James L. Madara
Published in Volume 107, Issue 1
J Clin Invest. 2001; 107(1):99–109 doi:10.1172/JCI10501
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 5

Purification of PIF revealed it to be the protein flagellin. (a) Outline of PIF purification method. Numbers in parentheses correspond to lane numbers in b. (b) Coomassie-stained gel showing PIF at various stages of purification. Lane 1: MW markers (in kDa: 205, 120, 84, 52, 36, 30, 22, 7). Lane 2: S. typhimurium supernatant (i.e., starting material; too dilute to detect any bands). Lane 3: Sample concentrated tenfold over 30-kDa cut-off Amicon filter. Lane 4: Concentrated sample after incubation with S-Sepharose cation exchange beads. Lane 5: The peak bioactive anion exchange fraction. This band was sequenced and found to be flagellin. FT, flow through.